brucellose IOP achat acomplia HDL hemorragie achat viagra travail cytologie achat rimonabant charge menstruation achat cialis age global achat acomplia equipe de dosage achat levitra canal generique achat clomid physique medicale achat kamagra politique RTI

Teutates Agreement

«The agreement also allows French scientists access to parts of several new high-tech laboratories built by the Ministry of Energy to keep U.S. nuclear weapons research alive following a test ban. One of them is the $1 billion national ignition system in Livermore, California, which will simulate the flow of radiation into a nuclear fireball. Another is a $400 million test center in Los Alamos, N.M. to take pictures of the inside of the dummy weapons. The agreement was ratified by the French and British parliaments in October 2016 and calls for the opening of eight centres of excellence. [21] [22] The Teutates agreement was signed in November by David Cameron and President Sarkozy and presented as an exercise in the military economy. We have been told that we and the French have similar needs in the «management» of our nuclear arsenals and that the sharing of research facilities will avoid costly duplication. It was not stressed that this treaty obliges the two nations to implement a 50-year programme of cooperation in the field of nuclear technology at a new hydrodynamic research facility called EPURE in Valduc, France, where the conditions of underground nuclear tests can be simulated and the terms of the comprehensive test ban treaty can be properly circumvented. Worse still, the existence of the 1996 Franco-American agreement, which builds on previous agreements on warhead security cooperation, is not secret (there was a press release) and is not a precise description for «opening the door to France, using NIF, DARHT and other institutions». These included a cooperation agreement on next-generation laser installations: the NIF in the United States, the LMJ (Laser Megajoule, inaugurated last month) in France. «A White House official, who helped oversee negotiations on the new agreement, said that a few years ago, Washington and Paris understood that they needed to amend the agreement to accommodate a test ban, focusing more intensely on maintaining existing weapons, while abandoning U.S. aid related to French weapons projects.

That`s how Jeff Smith described the New Washington Post Agreement in 1996: in September 2015, the defense ministers of both nations signed an agreement to implement centers of excellence in the missile sector. These technical centres have been designed to limit technological redundancies through the division of technical skills and skills between the two parties. The technologies developed in this context will then be integrated into the various MBDA programmes. This streamlines development costs through industrial integration and ensures the sustainability of industrial capacity on both sides of the Channel, while linking the two nations through «progressive and controlled interdependence.» [19] [20] «U.S. officials stated that the main challenge in the development of the agreement was to find a way to expand cooperation without handing over equipment that others might suspect to be helping Paris develop new weapons.

Los comentarios están cerrados.