brucellose IOP achat acomplia HDL hemorragie achat viagra travail cytologie achat rimonabant charge menstruation achat cialis age global achat acomplia equipe de dosage achat levitra canal generique achat clomid physique medicale achat kamagra politique RTI

1993 India China Agreement

In its statement of 30 June 2017, the Indian side ignored the reference to the 1890 convention – probably to remove bridges for a border settlement on the basis of a long-term political agreement and not on British-era agreements – and stated that there was only a «reciprocal agreement based on «reconciliation» that had been confirmed in 2012. and «further discussions need to take place to effectively close the border.» There was also an agreement between India and China to have «border crossings between India, China and third countries completed in agreement with the countries concerned.» [25] Article VI of the agreement stipulated that the border should be «along clearly defined and easily identifiable natural features,» which India had proposed for some time. Article IV and Article VII of the agreement, however, were more important. The former stated that a settlement would «take into account» the strategic interests of the other, while the latter indicated that it would «protect» the interests of populated populations in border areas. This indicated that it was possible to quickly establish a framework for the development of the border regime on the basis of a crude exchange of the demands of the two countries. [14] Fast avant-garde until 1993. India and China signed the LAC agreement without demarcation or demarcation (neither on the map nor on the ground) with the simple aim of maintaining peace and calm. Of course, the line that India accepted as THE LAC under the 1993 agreement may not have been where the Chinese said they were lying. For this, Beijing`s reference point was its 1959-60 requirement lines. The Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the People`s Republic of China (hereafter referred to as both parties), convinced that they serve the fundamental interests of the peoples of India and China to promote a long-term constructive and cooperative partnership based on the five principles of peaceful coexistence, mutual respect and sensitivity to the concerns and aspirations of the other and equality. , with the desire to qualitatively enhance bilateral relations at all levels and in all areas, while respecting differences in a manner that is fair, reasonable and acceptable to both sides, and to renew the commitment to respect and implement the agreement on peacekeeping and calm, signed on 7 September 1993, along the line of effective control in the border regions between India and China , and the agreement on confidence-building measures in the military field, signed on 23 June 2003, along the effective line of control in the border areas between the Republic of China and the border between the Republic of China and the Republic of China, signed on 29 November 1996, reaffirming the declaration on the principles of relations and comprehensive cooperation between India and China , recalling that both sides have appointed special representatives to review the framework of the settlement of the India-China border, and that the two special representatives, in a friendly, cooperative and constructive atmosphere, recalling that both sides are working to find a political solution to the border issue within the framework of their general and long-term interests. , signed in New Delhi on January 17, 2012, available on the Chinese database of AMF contracts in English, Chinese and Hindi.

The English text of the agreement is also contained in the Indian MEA database on Indian contracts. Both sides agreed to establish the WMCC to address important border issues related to peacekeeping and calm in the border regions of India and China. (Article 1) The WMCC will be led by an Indian MEA official at the joint secretaries level and an official at the executive level of the Chinese AMF and will be composed of diplomatic and military officials from both sides.

Los comentarios están cerrados.